Skip to main content

5 Highlights from Measuring B2B Tech Engagement Talk

I am a big fan of data, analytics, metrics and… you get it. So much so, I’ve recently published several posts:
Fitting that one of my colleagues shared a talk by the Director of Marketing, Diana Smith, of technology startup Segment: “Measuring for B2B Engagement”.

In this talk, Diana shares what and how to measure engagement in technology products/ services, especially (my favorite). It’s a quick sub-14’ video, but if you’re looking for the highlights, I’ve got you covered.
  • Develop a Tracking Plan. What events to track? Why? What properties should be captured? Location of the events to track (i.e. website page, app screen)?
  • Key to the Tracking Plan is defining a naming convention. The naming convention should start with the Object (i.e. user, account, document) and the action (i.e. signUp, delete, edit). Consistent naming conventions enable teams to easily and quickly align on metrics. Examples: userSignUp, accountDelete, documentEdit.
  • Question WHY you want to track. Understand WHAT you want to track and why. Start with 3-5 events. Diana recommends these three areas to start: Discovery (how the user has displayed interest), Engage (how users explore top feature(s)), and Convert (where users pay).
  • Pre-signup, be simple. When considering what to track pre-signup, track the origin of people hitting entering the site and conversion. Use Google Analytics.
  • Think about the important events of an app/ user from the very beginning. This enables everything downstream to be smoother and easier.
Diana gave a decent high-level talk on tracking without getting too technical. Check it out, and ensure your tracking aligns enables your business/ growth strategy.

What are your thoughts on event tracking and analytics? What are the metrics you care about and why? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You Make Time for What (and Who) Matters

I’ve always been a big proponent that you make time for the things and people that matter. Sounds simple, right? Then, why do so many not implement this better in their lives? Let me take a moment to recognize this more explicitly.
I touched on Laura Vanderkam’s TED Talk “How to Gain Control of Your Free Time” in last week’s post. In it, she shares a story of a woman who had a leak in her home. Coordinating with plumbers, and getting everything resolved, the woman estimated that it probably took seven hours of attention. That’s seven hours of “stuff” the woman hadn’t planned on doing. If you were to ask her (or most anyone) to find seven hours in the week before, she’d have told you, “heck, no, I don’t have seven hours. I’m busy!”
I was thinking of Laura’s talk in conjunction with Jacob Christensen’s How Will You Measure Your Life. Specifically, I’m aligning “making time” with Christensen’s Resources-Processes-Priorities framework. We make (process) time (resources) for the things th…

Vertical SaaS? Horizontal SaaS? It’s All News to Me

Not sure why, but I have only recently heard of a term called “Vertical SaaS”. Okay, there’s also “Horizontal SaaS”, too. Based on some light research, looks like vertical SaaS is also a growing trend and the number of companies fewer than horizontal SaaS providers.
Vertical SaaS borrows its moniker from the concept of vertical integration whereby there is more control over a supply chain from raw materials to point-of-sale. Here, vertical SaaS companies focus on a niche market (industry) offering a solution that enables more process control.
Horizontal SaaS providers get really good at a particular offering, and widen their market to reach scale. Their focus is on breadth of market, and thus, its sales and marketing strategies can require more resources.
Many vertical SaaS companies (such as Veeva Systems, Guidewire, Fleetmatics) are doing well usurping legacy systems of traditionally slow-tech-adoption industries. Here, vertical companies develop a best-of-breed product, and focu…

Leadership Take-Aways from Two of NCAA’s Most Successful Coaches

On my recent Delta flight, I read an interesting leadership article in Delta’s Sky magazine – the feature piece being an interview of two of the NCAA’s most successful coaches – Coach MikeKrzyzewski (Coach “K”) of Duke’s men’s basketball team and Coach Urban Meyer of Ohio State football with five and three national championships, respectively.
Given these two coaches’ storied careers, their leadership has incredible sustainability. Here are my take-aways from the article: Both coaches took leave of absences in their careers due to medical concerns. Their successes cultivated deeper motivations to win exacting significant physical, mental, social, and emotional tolls. After stepping away, however, each returned to coaching posts to continue winning ways, but implemented mechanisms and understanding to keep themselves in check. Take-away: To operate in peak form like their respective teams, leaders, too, need to ensure self-maintenance.The interviewer asked the coaches about social medi…