Skip to main content

Book Review: Think Like A Freak

I finally finished Think Like A Freak by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, the authors behind Freakonimics. The book brings to light stories and examples where unconventional thinking solved problems and motivated change.
Think Like a Freak by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner available on Amazon
My key take-aways/ favorite stories:
  • Not-for-profit org, Smile Train, routinely sent out mailers asking for donations (typical charity outreach) till for one campaign, they gave mail receivers an option to donate and opt-out of mailing forever or donate and continue receiving the mailers. Surprisingly, many recipients appreciated the ability to opt-out, and chose to receive periodic updates AND donated. Meanwhile, many who opted out did donate, and Smile Train saved money on never having to send mass mailers to those individuals again.
  • Zappos offers $2000 to any new hire to quit and never be have the ability to be hired again. This gives Zappos the ability to weed out those who would not fit into Zappos’ customer service culture. Meanwhile, a bad hire could cost the company upwards of $25K – Zappos’ return for $2000 was well justified. Less than 1% of new hires took the $2000.
  • Levitt and Dubner wanted to see how helping others make a resolute decision would affect others’ happiness and success. They created a website that let anyone ask a question of what they should do (quit a job or not? Ask for a raise, or no? Go to a concert or go to a dinner?). The site simply ran a coin flip. Levitt and Dubner found that there wasn’t a direct correlation of answer-seekers being happy or unhappy after going with the direction of the website. Levitt and Dubner concluded that more time trying to make a decision has little bearing on being happy or being more successful – just choose a direction.
  • Levitt and Dubner studied how often soccer players took penalties – shooting towards the sides or straight down the middle. Goalkeepers dive to the left 57% of the time, and to the right 41%; meaning, goalkeepers stay in the middle only 2% of the time. However, only 17% of penalty kicks are straight down the middle. Why? Because players think that when shooting down the middle if the goalie happens to stay (kick is missed), then players will be more easily ridiculed. Shooting to the side offers sanctuary in that “at least we tried, and the goalie got lucky”.
There are several other examples of innovative, unconventional thinking. It’s fascinating thinking about how I could use some unconventional thinking to better market and sell.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You Make Time for What (and Who) Matters

I’ve always been a big proponent that you make time for the things and people that matter. Sounds simple, right? Then, why do so many not implement this better in their lives? Let me take a moment to recognize this more explicitly.
I touched on Laura Vanderkam’s TED Talk “How to Gain Control of Your Free Time” in last week’s post. In it, she shares a story of a woman who had a leak in her home. Coordinating with plumbers, and getting everything resolved, the woman estimated that it probably took seven hours of attention. That’s seven hours of “stuff” the woman hadn’t planned on doing. If you were to ask her (or most anyone) to find seven hours in the week before, she’d have told you, “heck, no, I don’t have seven hours. I’m busy!”
I was thinking of Laura’s talk in conjunction with Jacob Christensen’s How Will You Measure Your Life. Specifically, I’m aligning “making time” with Christensen’s Resources-Processes-Priorities framework. We make (process) time (resources) for the things th…

Vertical SaaS? Horizontal SaaS? It’s All News to Me

Not sure why, but I have only recently heard of a term called “Vertical SaaS”. Okay, there’s also “Horizontal SaaS”, too. Based on some light research, looks like vertical SaaS is also a growing trend and the number of companies fewer than horizontal SaaS providers.
Vertical SaaS borrows its moniker from the concept of vertical integration whereby there is more control over a supply chain from raw materials to point-of-sale. Here, vertical SaaS companies focus on a niche market (industry) offering a solution that enables more process control.
Horizontal SaaS providers get really good at a particular offering, and widen their market to reach scale. Their focus is on breadth of market, and thus, its sales and marketing strategies can require more resources.
Many vertical SaaS companies (such as Veeva Systems, Guidewire, Fleetmatics) are doing well usurping legacy systems of traditionally slow-tech-adoption industries. Here, vertical companies develop a best-of-breed product, and focu…

My Life-Defining Moment Happened When I Failed to Make Varsity in High School

Ever stop to think about who you are? What makes you tick and tock? How about what you truly enjoy and what you’re good at vs. not good at? Or what/ who has shaped you into the person you are today?
I’m at this stage of figuring out whether to continue independent consulting while iterating on ideas for the next startup or take on some full-time employment (consulting, product management, or otherwise). My recent post about my daily/ weekly schedule was an interesting exercise in stepping back and recognizing what I’m actually doing in a day, and made me really think at the macro level.
In one of my recent reflections, I thought about defining moments in my life. One of those watershed events that truly transformed me was my failure to make the Varsity soccer team in high school. I won’t rehash the whole story here – shared the story almost a year ago in my post titled “Getting Through Dark Moments and the Most Vulnerable Story I've Ever Told Publicly”. It’s this moment that I w…