Skip to main content

When To Jump Into Entrepreneurship Full-Time?

I spoke to an Emory entrepreneur and venture capital club last Friday, and before I began, I solicited questions they had. The group of 20-30 undergrad students had a mix of no entrepreneurship/ startup experience, some experience with startups/ accelerators, and a few having started something.

One question I thought was interesting – one that I have received numerous times from others – was “when do you know to go full-time?”

The answer: it depends. (This is almost always the answer.)

The best case, I suppose, is when the market (customers) is giving you signs that you need to take the big leap. This can come when:
  • You are working on an idea part-time, and traction starts to pick up to the point that revenue coming in can cover your basic living needs or that it’s sustainable and projecting growth to do so.
  • You are working part-time, and the support required to ensure sustained traction and growth of customers is demanding more of your time and effort.
  • You are gaining little value in whatever position you’re in now, and you have enough safety net (savings? job opportunities elsewhere? education?) that empower you to take the “risk”. (I put “risk” in quotes because risk can come in many forms.)
  • You just want to… you feel the pull. Like the Apple Jacks commercials from the 90s, sometimes, you just “do”. That is, you feel some urge to make the leap, and you do so because you’re compelled to with all the confidence and fear riding high within you.
There are no sure reasons. It’s up to you, but you can certainly do things to mitigate risks of failure. Jump when you feel it’s right, and you know you can commit to a long-term strategy of learning and overcoming obstacles.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You Make Time for What (and Who) Matters

I’ve always been a big proponent that you make time for the things and people that matter. Sounds simple, right? Then, why do so many not implement this better in their lives? Let me take a moment to recognize this more explicitly.
I touched on Laura Vanderkam’s TED Talk “How to Gain Control of Your Free Time” in last week’s post. In it, she shares a story of a woman who had a leak in her home. Coordinating with plumbers, and getting everything resolved, the woman estimated that it probably took seven hours of attention. That’s seven hours of “stuff” the woman hadn’t planned on doing. If you were to ask her (or most anyone) to find seven hours in the week before, she’d have told you, “heck, no, I don’t have seven hours. I’m busy!”
I was thinking of Laura’s talk in conjunction with Jacob Christensen’s How Will You Measure Your Life. Specifically, I’m aligning “making time” with Christensen’s Resources-Processes-Priorities framework. We make (process) time (resources) for the things th…

Vertical SaaS? Horizontal SaaS? It’s All News to Me

Not sure why, but I have only recently heard of a term called “Vertical SaaS”. Okay, there’s also “Horizontal SaaS”, too. Based on some light research, looks like vertical SaaS is also a growing trend and the number of companies fewer than horizontal SaaS providers.
Vertical SaaS borrows its moniker from the concept of vertical integration whereby there is more control over a supply chain from raw materials to point-of-sale. Here, vertical SaaS companies focus on a niche market (industry) offering a solution that enables more process control.
Horizontal SaaS providers get really good at a particular offering, and widen their market to reach scale. Their focus is on breadth of market, and thus, its sales and marketing strategies can require more resources.
Many vertical SaaS companies (such as Veeva Systems, Guidewire, Fleetmatics) are doing well usurping legacy systems of traditionally slow-tech-adoption industries. Here, vertical companies develop a best-of-breed product, and focu…

Leadership Take-Aways from Two of NCAA’s Most Successful Coaches

On my recent Delta flight, I read an interesting leadership article in Delta’s Sky magazine – the feature piece being an interview of two of the NCAA’s most successful coaches – Coach MikeKrzyzewski (Coach “K”) of Duke’s men’s basketball team and Coach Urban Meyer of Ohio State football with five and three national championships, respectively.
Given these two coaches’ storied careers, their leadership has incredible sustainability. Here are my take-aways from the article: Both coaches took leave of absences in their careers due to medical concerns. Their successes cultivated deeper motivations to win exacting significant physical, mental, social, and emotional tolls. After stepping away, however, each returned to coaching posts to continue winning ways, but implemented mechanisms and understanding to keep themselves in check. Take-away: To operate in peak form like their respective teams, leaders, too, need to ensure self-maintenance.The interviewer asked the coaches about social medi…