Skip to main content

Finance of Startups: For Dummies (Part 10 – Match Group, Inc. S-1)


Last week, Match Group, Inc. filed its S-1 in its initial public offering under the stock symbol “MTCH”. You probably know MTCH as one of the largest online dating sites in the world as Match.com. They also own and operate OkCupid, and Tinder and over 37 other brands. Outside of dating, they also own The Princeton Review – an education site devoted to test preparation, academic tutoring, and the like.

The company is looking to raise $100M through its IPO. Here are some of my notes:
  • Three classes of common stock: common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock – generally “similar”, but common stock will have one vote per share. Class B will have 10 votes per share. Class C has virtually no votes per share.
  • Match Group, Inc. is owned by IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC)
  • The company’s mission: “Establishing a romantic connection is a fundamental human need. Whether it's a good date, a meaningful relationship or an enduring marriage, romantic connectivity lifts the human spirit. Our mission is to increase romantic connectivity worldwide.”
  • 59 million monthly active users (MAU) with 4.7 million paid subscribers (8.0% of MAU) across its brands today up from 8 million MAU in 2011 representing a 63% compound annual growth rate (48% excluding acquisitions)
  • OkCupid was acquired in 2011
  • First half of 2015 saw 68% of new users sign up via mobile vs. 27% in 2013
  • Benefits for users include: Expanded Options; Efficiency; More Comfort and Control; and Convenience
  • A few competitive advantages listed: brand (4 out of the 5 top online dating brands are represented by MTCH); scale (significant scale = more opportunities for users to meet); multiple brands (address the many different markets MTCH is selling to)
  • Acquiring PlentyOfFish Media, Inc. ~$575.0M… scheduled to close Q4 2015
  • Because the company has less than $1.0B in revenue in its last fiscal year, the company qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as defined by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (JOBS)
  • Revenues (2012-2014): $713.4M, $803.1M, $888.3M.
  • Key metrics
o   “Total Dating Revenue” which includes both direct user-paid monies and indirect (amounts wholly from advertising)
o   “Paid Member Counts” (PMC). From 2012-2014, Total PMC grew 25% to 3.5M
o   Average Revenue per Paying User (ARPPU)
  • Company notes decline of email usage as a risk to the business. Many of MTCH’s communities (users of the various brands) rely on email to communicate new users, new interactions, and the like. However, consumer habits have changed so that email usage has declined. The absence of a communication method as effective as email is a significant risk
  • Given the Ashley Madison hack earlier this year, no surprise MTCH lists its potential inability to protect from cyber threats as a major risk factor
  • International revenue accounts for 31% of total revenue through 1H 2015
  • 36% of all members in 2011 were under the age of 35. By end of the 1H 2015, that number is 62% reflecting mobile adoption, lower average revenue per user (ARPU), etc.
  • Due to the shift of monetization towards lower cost brands, “youthfulness”, and the like, user acquisition channels has also shifted to lower cost channels. Thus, cost of acquisition has accordingly dropped
  • Demand is highest in the first quarter of the year with Q4 being the lowest demand
  • Over 40 brands represented in MTCH with 25 acquisitions since Jan 2009
  • The CEO, Sam Yagan, founded OkCupid in 2003. He also founded SparkNotes in 1999 and eDonkey in 2002

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vertical SaaS? Horizontal SaaS? It’s All News to Me

Not sure why, but I have only recently heard of a term called “Vertical SaaS”. Okay, there’s also “Horizontal SaaS”, too. Based on some light research, looks like vertical SaaS is also a growing trend and the number of companies fewer than horizontal SaaS providers.
Vertical SaaS borrows its moniker from the concept of vertical integration whereby there is more control over a supply chain from raw materials to point-of-sale. Here, vertical SaaS companies focus on a niche market (industry) offering a solution that enables more process control.
Horizontal SaaS providers get really good at a particular offering, and widen their market to reach scale. Their focus is on breadth of market, and thus, its sales and marketing strategies can require more resources.
Many vertical SaaS companies (such as Veeva Systems, Guidewire, Fleetmatics) are doing well usurping legacy systems of traditionally slow-tech-adoption industries. Here, vertical companies develop a best-of-breed product, and focu…

My Life-Defining Moment Happened When I Failed to Make Varsity in High School

Ever stop to think about who you are? What makes you tick and tock? How about what you truly enjoy and what you’re good at vs. not good at? Or what/ who has shaped you into the person you are today?
I’m at this stage of figuring out whether to continue independent consulting while iterating on ideas for the next startup or take on some full-time employment (consulting, product management, or otherwise). My recent post about my daily/ weekly schedule was an interesting exercise in stepping back and recognizing what I’m actually doing in a day, and made me really think at the macro level.
In one of my recent reflections, I thought about defining moments in my life. One of those watershed events that truly transformed me was my failure to make the Varsity soccer team in high school. I won’t rehash the whole story here – shared the story almost a year ago in my post titled “Getting Through Dark Moments and the Most Vulnerable Story I've Ever Told Publicly”. It’s this moment that I w…

De-Risk for Investments

I was talking to a Producer and Director recently who is starting out his business. He’s got his business set up, and is seeking investors for a film. He’s got the script. He’s ready to go. Except, the investors want him to slow down. The investors wanted to “de-risk” the investment. New to being an entrepreneur, the Producer shared the nuances he wasn’t quite prepared for. Expected ReturnsSaaStr states that a 10% return on the total venture capital (VC) fund is good while aiming to earn its total VC fund in profits is the goal. Understand what the goals of the investor(s) are, and have the model to illustrate goals can be met with even conservative achievement.Legal Collateral – The Producer was shocked to learn how much he had to spend to validate the authenticity and originality of the script. Investors are looking at legal terms and insurance to not only cover risks of copyright infringement, but also the leveragability for greater valuation.Long-Term Strategy – Are you a one-h…