Skip to main content

PAUSE! Her Startup’s Seeking Funding

I was recently introduced to a wantrepeneur building a platform with an experiential method of consuming media with an ecommerce side to it. I’m skeptical of the experiential component. Then again, I’m skeptical of a lot. Instead, show me the numbers (user engagement, traction, and any revenue numbers). However, she has none to show, and isn’t actively able to provide any.

She has a great v1.0 already that can be marketed to test traction and gather feedback, but she’s reluctant, opting for a feature-full release. After months with v1.0, progress is on hold as she seeks funding to build her “needed” features.

ZERO users. ZERO revenue. Ideas on business model, but that’s it. Trying to raise six figures. That’ll be tough.

Some thoughts:
  • Seeking funding takes TIME! My friend underestimates the efforts to raise funds -- prospecting potential investors, setting up meetings, creating pitch decks, etc.
  • With or without funding, what’s happening? Her “startup” is stagnant. There’s no feedback from users (none anyways). No product development. Each day that passes, the market evolves, and a competitor entrenches itself with the market.
  • Life happens. How do you cope? My friend’s early partners have left due to life complications. This happens. However, she’s stuck unsure of how to proceed like hoping a good, cheap developer falls into her lap.
  • Raising funds with no traction in a difficult-to-defend market?! Startups and entrepreneurship are today’s “it” thing, so there’s lots of noise from those seeking money. Investors mitigate some risk by startups’ traction.
I like TechCrunch’s “Wasting Time with the Joneses” article calling funding as “hyperdrive, not a joy ride”. That is, “If you lay in the proper course, it will take you far. If you haven’t, you’ll just be way off the mark and beyond the reach of anyone to save you.”

What are the traps of seeking funding while still in the early stages of product development? How could entrepreneurs be successful in raising capital without traction?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You Make Time for What (and Who) Matters

I’ve always been a big proponent that you make time for the things and people that matter. Sounds simple, right? Then, why do so many not implement this better in their lives? Let me take a moment to recognize this more explicitly.
I touched on Laura Vanderkam’s TED Talk “How to Gain Control of Your Free Time” in last week’s post. In it, she shares a story of a woman who had a leak in her home. Coordinating with plumbers, and getting everything resolved, the woman estimated that it probably took seven hours of attention. That’s seven hours of “stuff” the woman hadn’t planned on doing. If you were to ask her (or most anyone) to find seven hours in the week before, she’d have told you, “heck, no, I don’t have seven hours. I’m busy!”
I was thinking of Laura’s talk in conjunction with Jacob Christensen’s How Will You Measure Your Life. Specifically, I’m aligning “making time” with Christensen’s Resources-Processes-Priorities framework. We make (process) time (resources) for the things th…

Vertical SaaS? Horizontal SaaS? It’s All News to Me

Not sure why, but I have only recently heard of a term called “Vertical SaaS”. Okay, there’s also “Horizontal SaaS”, too. Based on some light research, looks like vertical SaaS is also a growing trend and the number of companies fewer than horizontal SaaS providers.
Vertical SaaS borrows its moniker from the concept of vertical integration whereby there is more control over a supply chain from raw materials to point-of-sale. Here, vertical SaaS companies focus on a niche market (industry) offering a solution that enables more process control.
Horizontal SaaS providers get really good at a particular offering, and widen their market to reach scale. Their focus is on breadth of market, and thus, its sales and marketing strategies can require more resources.
Many vertical SaaS companies (such as Veeva Systems, Guidewire, Fleetmatics) are doing well usurping legacy systems of traditionally slow-tech-adoption industries. Here, vertical companies develop a best-of-breed product, and focu…

Leadership Take-Aways from Two of NCAA’s Most Successful Coaches

On my recent Delta flight, I read an interesting leadership article in Delta’s Sky magazine – the feature piece being an interview of two of the NCAA’s most successful coaches – Coach MikeKrzyzewski (Coach “K”) of Duke’s men’s basketball team and Coach Urban Meyer of Ohio State football with five and three national championships, respectively.
Given these two coaches’ storied careers, their leadership has incredible sustainability. Here are my take-aways from the article: Both coaches took leave of absences in their careers due to medical concerns. Their successes cultivated deeper motivations to win exacting significant physical, mental, social, and emotional tolls. After stepping away, however, each returned to coaching posts to continue winning ways, but implemented mechanisms and understanding to keep themselves in check. Take-away: To operate in peak form like their respective teams, leaders, too, need to ensure self-maintenance.The interviewer asked the coaches about social medi…